Kyle Anthony Archer, 37, of Fredericton, admitted to sexually assaulting minor, making child porn, and agreed to five-year sentence, but is seeking to challenge case anyway
Copyright in an image does not equate to ownership of the physical object. I have several pieces of art hanging on my living room wall; the original artist still owns the copyright, but I own the actual painting. As the owner of the object, I can do anything that I wish with the art except distribute copies thereof. The artist has no legal basis to require its return.
"This may sound kind of stupid, but I don’t even know what an appeal is" yea bs #1 just trying to play the court system again to waste time pretty shure his lawyer probably mentioned appeal and told him what it was :/
#2 "Archer denied he was trying to get his hands on those images" if you read back the last article Don posted on here he litterly said he wanted to see the pictures and look at them again doesnt want to get his hands on the pictures again yea total horse poo i would say he got what he deserved but he didnt should be in prision ALOT longer then he is now
His sentence should not be shortened, but extended. His crime against a child will affect her for life, his his sentence should not be shorter than that.....Lord only knows how many other victims he may have out there that we know nothing about. Let his jail mates have him, and see how he likes being a victim, the sick SOB deserves a life sentence of misery
Disgusting, copy write material????
I do not follow Archer's argument here.
Copyright in an image does not equate to ownership of the physical object. I have several pieces of art hanging on my living room wall; the original artist still owns the copyright, but I own the actual painting. As the owner of the object, I can do anything that I wish with the art except distribute copies thereof. The artist has no legal basis to require its return.
Give nothing but a longer sentence
ok 2 parts of what he said is total bs
"This may sound kind of stupid, but I don’t even know what an appeal is" yea bs #1 just trying to play the court system again to waste time pretty shure his lawyer probably mentioned appeal and told him what it was :/
#2 "Archer denied he was trying to get his hands on those images" if you read back the last article Don posted on here he litterly said he wanted to see the pictures and look at them again doesnt want to get his hands on the pictures again yea total horse poo i would say he got what he deserved but he didnt should be in prision ALOT longer then he is now
His sentence should not be shortened, but extended. His crime against a child will affect her for life, his his sentence should not be shorter than that.....Lord only knows how many other victims he may have out there that we know nothing about. Let his jail mates have him, and see how he likes being a victim, the sick SOB deserves a life sentence of misery