As a user of a portion of this highway on a regular basis, I was disappointed to read this article. This section of highway is poorly maintained and in deplorable condition. I can’t fathom where the $$ is going - it’s certainly not to maintain the highway.
Surely in this multi year contract there are highway safety and engineering standards to which MRDC must maintain the highway. If they are receiving this much taxpayer $$, hold their feet to the fire!
As a user of a portion of this highway on a regular basis, I was disappointed to read this article. This section of highway is poorly maintained and in deplorable condition. I can’t fathom where the $$ is going - it’s certainly not to maintain the highway.
Surely in this multi year contract there are highway safety and engineering standards to which MRDC must maintain the highway. If they are receiving this much taxpayer $$, hold their feet to the fire!